|
|
•Structural
differences between rotor-& ring-spun yarns
|
- – It
will be recalled that ring-spun yarn contains envelope twist
[twisting in the fibres from outside inwards], whereas
rotor-spun yarn has core twist [twisting in the fibres from
the inside outwards].
- – Rotor
spun yarn is therefore more voluminous, more open &
rougher than ring spun yarn.
- –The
fibres in the envelope layer of a rotor-spun yarn can partly
escape the twisting action during spinning &
therefore take up turns of twist.
- – They
thus contribute relatively little to yarn strength & can
more easily be rubbed together axially to form slubs, etc.
- – Rotor
spun yarn generally needs rather more turns of twist than ring
spun yarn.
- – Furthermore,
the fibres in a rotor-spun yarn are less parallel than those
in a ring-spun yarn.
- – The
core twist structure & the lower degree of parallelism are
the causes of lower strength of rotor-spun yarn, & also of
most other character differences.
- –The
role of the wrapping fibres should also not be overlooked, but
it is less important than those roles mentioned above.
- – The
positive characteristics of rotor-spun yarns become more
marked the shorter the fibres in the strand.
- –The
following sections will set out the most important differences
in the characteristics of rotor-& ring-spun yarn [ of
carded cotton].
|
•Rotor-spun
yarn compared with ring spun yarn
|
Properties
|
Rotor Spun Yarns Compared With The Ring Spun Yarns
|
|
|
Lower |
•Coefficient
of variation of strength
|
Better |
|
|
Often
Higher |
|
Mass irregularity [over short lengths]
|
Better |
|
Imperfections
|
Lower |
| Volume |
Greater |
| Resistance
To Abrasion |
Better |
| Stiffness |
Higher |
| Handle |
Harder |
Aesthetic Properties
|
| Surface |
Rougher |
| Hairiness |
Lower |
| Luster |
Duller |
Important Differences In Further Processing
|
•Tendency
to form slubs under axial force.
|
Greater |
| Coefficient
Of Friction |
Higher |
| Knot (Loop)
Strength |
Lower |
| Resistance
To Abrasion |
Better |
| Hairiness |
Lower |
| Tendency To
Snarl |
Lower |
| Work
Capacity Under Cyclic Loading |
Higher |
| Capacity To
Take Up Dye |
Higher |
| End Breaks
In Warping |
Lesser By
50% |
| Knots After
Winding |
Lesser By
15-17 /Kg. |
| Warp Breaks
In Weaving |
Lesser By
70% |
| Weft Breaks
In Weaving |
Lesser By
25% |
Fabric Properties
|
| Tensile
Strength |
Lesser |
| Tearing
Strength |
Lesser |
| Bursting
Strength |
Lesser |
| Appearance |
More
Uniform |
| Barring |
Very Much
Better |
| Cover |
10% Better |
| Cleanliness |
Better |
| Neppiness |
Fewer Neps |
| Resistance
To Abrasion |
5-7% Better |
| Handle |
Harsher Or
Crisper |
| Thermal
Insulation |
10-15%
Better |
| Air
Permeability |
15-25%
Better |
| Absorption
Of Water |
Much Better |
| Take Up Of
Dyes |
Better |
| Shrinkage |
Same |
| Raisings |
Easier
& Uniformer |